Where have I heard this before? :) Kent
Churches can't afford a rift over hymn styles
To the Editor:
Republicans vs. Democrats. Pro-choice vs. pro-life. It seems to always be "us vs. them." And now, it's in our churches. Contemporary music vs. traditional hymns. Has anyone noticed it besides me?
Many churches seem to be battling it out. One part of the congregation enjoys the drum-driven, loud-guitar music. The other part seems bewildered by the disappearance of the old familiar hymns. You're either "with it and progressive," or you're "stale, close-minded and grumpy." Why? Whatever happened to diversity and acceptance, especially in worship?
In April, I attended the Community Hymn Sing at the Schermerhorn Symphony Center. We experienced every kind of music — the old, sweet songs, soul, majestic anthems, full orchestration, a cappella and even what some would call rock. It was wonderful! Why? Because every song was presented the way it should be experienced. Every song has its own emotion and character. All contemporary music doesn't have to be wild. A traditional hymn, sung properly, should never be dull.
It largely depends on the music leadership. He/she should first understand the music, then pass that knowledge on to the other participants. A tall order in this day of controversy and opinions. But the music in a religious setting is of great importance. The musicians owe it to their people to be creative and sensitive in their planning. Some songs need drums and guitars. Other songs beg for an organ.
Churches can't afford the time and energy to argue over music!
Joyce Bell
Joelton 37080
No comments:
Post a Comment